To subscribe or unsubscribe to Weathering Change click here.
Weathering Change

Northern Climate ExChange

INSIDE COP 11

contents: summer 2006


Inside COP 11: Elizabeth May looks back

ELIZABETH MAY, FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, SIERRA CLUB OF CANADA

The Eleventh Conference of the Parties of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP 11) coinciding with the first Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (COP-MOP 1) sounds so overwhelmingly bureaucratic that it is hard to imagine such a mouthful could be exciting. In fact, the Montreal climate conference was one of the great triumphs of the global movement of citizen activists for action on climate change.

The fact that the conference was held in Canada at all was the result of pressure from Canadian civil society. The "buzz" about Canada potentially hosting started in the fall of 2004 at COP 10 in Buenos Aires. With Russian ratification of Kyoto complete, everyone knew it would be coming into force on February 16, 2005. The reality of (at long last) having Kyoto a legally binding treaty made COP 11 a particularly significant gathering with a heavy agenda. The optics of holding the conference in Canada were very attractive. No climate negotiation had ever taken place in North America. The idea of having Canada host was appealing as it would provide an ideal opportunity to educate the US, governments, media and public, to the reality that Kyoto was not dead. Environmental groups and leading Canadian business, such as Alcan, urged former Prime Minister Paul Martin to hold the meeting in Canada. He agreed.

The stakes against success were enormous. The United States was unyielding in the lead up, admitting climate change was real, but seeking to undermine Kyoto with voluntary (useless) alternative mechanisms of its own, such as the Asia Pacific Technology Partnership Agreement.

Former Environment Minister Stephane Dion deserves enormous credit for the most intensive advance work of any Environment Minister. As host country, our Minister of Environment moved to the position of President of COP 11. Months before the official acceptance of the title, Dion was doing shuttle diplomacy to find common ground among the many different factions in the negotiations.

In September, members of Climate Action Network from around the world gathered in Montreal to set out our strategy. We looked at the increasing urgency of the science. We need reductions on the order of 30% below 1990 levels by 2020 to avoid "tipping points" sometimes called "points of no return." Ultimately, we need reductions of 80% below 1990 by 2050. Activists from around the world set out the minimum set of good results from COP-MOP 1 if we were to have any hope of reaching these mid and long term goals. The current "Kyoto targets" are to be achieved in the period between 2008-2012, called the "first commitment period." Critical progress in Montreal would include the launch of serious, fast-tracked negotiations to have a new commitment period starting in 2013. Then we looked to see what governments would accept those positions. At that point, we could only identify Canada as a "maybe." No governments were lined up in the column supporting strong decisions.

The situation was not promising, but things became much worse. On the opening day of the conference, Opposition Parties defeated the Martin Government. Thousands of diplomats and negotiators form around the world were stunned. No host government has ever fallen in the midst of climate negotiations. Dion was magnificent. He reassured people that he was full time President of COP 11. Domestic politics and campaigning would wait until after the negotiations were over. He more than kept his word. He worked tirelessly.

Throughout the conference, every day environmentalists from around the world met in strategy sessions. We compared information. What delegation might shift? Which developing countries were most interested in pursuing the Clean Development Mechanism? Which industrialized countries were prepared to negotiate real targets for the commitment period after 2012?

The US delegation, as expected, was obstructionist, at one point walking out of high-level talks. It turned out to be a very tense moment for former US President Bill Clinton to come and speak (at our invitation), but his diplomacy and commitment to real reductions helped force the US to behave. Then the Russians nearly scuttled the deal. The last round of negotiations ran all through the night of December 9th, into the wee hours of December 10th.

Ultimately, at 6:17 AM after more than 36 hours of straight negotiations, Dion gaveled in all the decisions that had been set out as our "best case" result back in September. Every single decision that came out of COP-MOP 1 was from the "strong decision" column, where just months before, not a single government stood. Miraculous.


A note from the editor

KATHARINE SANDIFORD, NORTHERN CLIMATE EXCHANGE

Welcome to the first electronic edition of Weathering Change. Although funding cuts, program cancellations, and staff reductions have led us to make this switch, we feel it is a huge improvement and welcome change from our paper version. The title is fitting, for indeed, this little newsletter is weathering the change, rolling with the punches, and striving to adapt to whatever the political or financial climate may be. And in the end, we are saving money, sparing trees, and reducing our greenhouse gas emissions.

This is the first of many issues to come. Apologies for the retrospective or seemingly out-of-date theme. COP 11 feels like lightyears away. But perhaps now, in the midst of so much rethinking on Canada's stance in the global climate change negotiations, is a good time to look back and remember the strength of our role as COP11 host country and as chair of the United Nations discussions on climate change.

The climate is changing... and so are we.


Stephane Dion's Arctic Day speech

STEPHANE DION, FORMER MINISTER OF THE ENVIRONMENT

Editor's note: We have republished here Stephane Dion's succinct and powerful speech from the opening ceremony of Arctic Day, a parallel event at COP 11. The purpose of Arctic day is to raise awareness of the impact of climate change on the Arctic and peoples living in the Arctic.

Good morning everyone.

Canada, as an Arctic nation, is proud to support the first Arctic Day. This is an opportunity to bring the Arctic to this forum and highlight both scientific, traditional knowledge and the culture of Northern indigenous peoples.

I would like to thank the many Elders who have come from so far to be a part of this day to share their invaluable and traditional knowledge with us. I’d also like to thank Liseanne Forand from Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, Jose Kusugak, President of the Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, Sheila Watt-Cloutier, Chair of the Inuit Circumpolar Conference, Grand Chief Andy Carvill from the Yukon First Nations, Dr. Klaus Toepfer, Executive Director of the United Nations Environment Program, and Ms. Okpik Pitseolak for leading this morning’s opening ceremony.

The future of the North is critical to the health of our planet.

Increasing global concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases due to human activities, primarily fossil fuel burning, are projected to contribute to additional arctic warming of about 4-7°C over the next 100 years.

Increasing precipitation, shorter and warmer winters, and substantial decreases in snow cover and ice cover are among the projected changes that are very likely to persist for centuries.

Arctic vegetation zones are very likely to shift, causing wide-ranging impacts.

Disturbances such as insect outbreaks and forest fires are very likely to increase in frequency, severity, and duration, facilitating invasions by non-native species.

Animal species' diversity, ranges, and distribution will change.

Reductions in sea ice will drastically shrink marine habitat for polar bears, ice-inhabiting seals, and some seabirds, pushing some species toward extinction.

The Arctic is not a laboratory, not only a place to conduct expeditions; it is a place where people live, with a rich culture that has evolved over thousands of years.

Because of global warming, indigenous communities are facing major economic and cultural impacts.

Many Indigenous Peoples depend on hunting polar bear, walrus, seals, and caribou, herding reindeer, fishing, and gathering, not only for food and to support the local economy, but also as the basis for cultural and social identity.

How is climate change affecting the peoples of the North, threatening their livelihood and cultural survival?

The reduction in sea ice will have serious consequences for polar bears, ice-dependent seals, and local people for whom these animals are a primary food source.

Many coastal communities and facilities face increasing exposure to storms.

In some cases, communities and industrial facilities in coastal zones are already threatened or being forced to relocate, while others face increasing risks and costs.

Thawing ground will disrupt transportation, buildings, and other infrastructure.

Transportation and industry on land, including oil and gas extraction and forestry, will increasingly be disrupted by the shortening of the periods during which ice roads and tundra are frozen sufficiently to permit travel.

As frozen ground thaws, many existing buildings, roads, pipelines, airports, and industrial facilities are likely to be destabilized, requiring substantial rebuilding, maintenance, and investment.

What is happening to the Arctic is a harbinger of things to come in the rest of the world.

Arctic warming and its consequences have worldwide implications.

Melting of highly reflective arctic snow and ice reveals darker land and ocean surfaces, increasing absorption of the sun’s heat and further warming the planet.

Increases in glacial melt and river runoff add more freshwater to the ocean, raising global sea level and possibly slowing the ocean circulation that brings heat from the tropics to the poles, affecting global and regional climate.

We recognize the importance of the Arctic Council in addressing the many common concerns and challenges emerging from climate change and providing a forum for collective action on shared priorities.

Not only does the Arctic Council engage Arctic nations, it also includes six Permanent Participants that represent Northern indigenous peoples who actively bring their voice to the work of the Council. This inclusive process ensures that steps forward to protect our shared Arctic will integrate social, cultural, health and economic components.

Last November, the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment was received at the fourth Arctic Council Ministerial meeting in Reykjavik, Iceland. This is the first climate assessment of the Arctic – a result of four years of international efforts from over 300 scientists, as well as traditional knowledge of Northern Indigenous peoples.

The Assessment confirms what our own science and the people of the Arctic have been telling us for many years: the Arctic is already experiencing some of the most rapid and severe climate change on earth.

We welcome the upcoming International Polar Year beginning in 2007, co-sponsored by the International Council for Science and the World Meteorological Organization.

This is the first International Polar Year that includes a focus on the human, social and economic dimensions of life in the North.

This year will enhance knowledge of Polar regions, encourage cooperative Arctic research, raise awareness of Arctic climate change issues and create significant linkages to climate, ecosystems and communities around the world.

The main goal is to carry out an innovative, interdisciplinary program for International Polar Year (IPY) along with our international partners.

As a key deliverable for International Polar Year, the Government of Canada is supporting a targeted science and research program focused on two of Canada's most important challenges for its northern regions - climate change impacts and adaptation, and the health and well-being of northern communities.

Funds will be allocated to academic, government and community researchers through a competitive, peer review process. With this funding, Canada will be able to provide leadership internationally on projects in which Canadian scientists have renowned expertise.

It is also critical that the stories of the Arctic indigenous peoples be heard. That is why people from across the Arctic are here today –as witnesses of the impacts of climate change and as catalysts for action to slow that change in their homelands.

I look forward to reading the Arctic Youth’s Video Declaration, which I understand will be presented later today. I have heard that this video clearly underlines our responsibility to act now to ensure the future for our children and childrens’ children. It puts the human face on climate change and inspires us, as leaders, to do more.

Bringing greater awareness of the sensitivity of climate change impacts to the Arctic is a key step in accomplishing our common goal.

I wish you great success on this extremely important task.

Thank you.


Putting the human face on climate change

SHEILA WATT-CLOUTIER, CHAIR, INUIT CIRCUMPOLAR CONFERENCE

Editor's note: Sheila Watt-Cloutier announced a Climate Change Petition by the Inuit Circumpolar Conference to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights during a side event at COP 11. Following are excerpts from her speech.

For more than 20 years Inuit hunters and elders have reported changes to the natural environment. Science and traditional knowledge are saying the same thing: melting permafrost, thinning and ablation of sea ice, receding glaciers, "invasion" of species of animals not previously seen in the Arctic, increased coastal erosion, longer and warmer summers and shorter winters. The magnitude of these changes varies from place to place, but the trend is consistent across the Arctic.

What is happening affects virtually every facet of Inuit life-we are a people of the land, ice, snow, and animals. Our hunting culture thrives on the cold. We need it to be cold to maintain our culture and way of life. Climate change has become the ultimate threat to Inuit culture.

[The Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA) states that] "For Inuit, warming is likely to disrupt or even destroy their hunting and food sharing culture as reduced sea ice causes the animals on which they depend to decline, become less accessible, and possibly become extinct."

Inuit are adaptable and resourceful. We have to be to survive in the Arctic. But the ACIA foresees a time - within the lifetime of my eight year old grandson -when environmental change will be so great that Inuit will no longer be able to maintain their hunting culture. Already Inuit are struggling to adapt to the impacts of climate change.

Following more than two years of preparation we have submitted today a petition to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights based in Washington DC. Our petition asks the commission to come to the Arctic to find out what climate change is doing to the environment and to Inuit. We seek a declaration from the commission that the United States - the world's source of more than 25% of greenhouse gases - is violating our human rights as outlined in the 1948 American Declaration on the Rights and Duties of Man. As we have seen in the last few days the United States continues to refuse to work with the community of nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Let me say clearly that this is not about money. We are not seeking damages. What we want is the United States to stop violating our rights. To do that the United States needs to lead the international effort for absolute reductions in emission of greenhouse gases. Without absolute reductions Inuit hunting and food sharing culture will not survive.

The Arctic can help us all look beyond narrowly defined national interests to create a global perspective. This is what's needed if we are to combat climate change. The "Voice from the North" can help determine the global level of greenhouse gas reductions required to achieve the goal of the [United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change].

The full text of this speech as well as the petition can be found on the Inuit Circumpolar Conference web site at www.inuitcircumpolar.com


Declaration on climate change from youth of the Arctic

ARCTIC YOUTH NETWORK

Editor's note: The Arctic Youth Network is a grassroots organization that works on leadership and empowerment for youth from around the circumpolar North. AYN released this declaration on climate change at the Arctic Day parallel event at COP 11. See their website: www.taiga.net/ayn

We, youth from the Circumpolar North, realize that the world is facing a threat unlike anything ever experienced before in human history. Here in the Arctic, where the impacts of climate change are happening at an accelerated rate, we feel our physical environment, our culture, and our spirituality, are being disrupted.

Sea ice is melting, coastlines are exposed and degrading, and species are at risk. Communities are being forced to give up land based traditions and Traditional Knowledge is being lost. Indigenous Peoples 'ways of being' continue to be threatened.

Our ecosystems are disturbed; we are vulnerable.

The science surrounding our changing climate has now existed for the same amount of time that we have been alive. Arguing the validity of climate change science is no longer worthwhile -- it is now time to act -- and act with conviction.

We are supporting research on impacts, mitigation and adaptation to climate change. We are encouraging our peers and our communities to become informed and engaged. Individually, we are taking responsibility for our actions. By reducing our personal greenhouse gas emissions, engaging in activities with lower environmental impacts, and making conscious choices, we are reflecting the world we want to live in.

We are challenging fossil fuel development such as the proposed drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska, United States, the proposed Mackenzie Gas Project in the Northwest Territories of Canada and oil drilling in the Lensky region of Russia's Sakha Republic.

We see the importance of taking steps now to lay a foundation for change that will reach far into the future.

The global community has come a long way in a short time. Thank you to the United Nations for its Framework Convention on Climate Change. The Kyoto Protocol is a step in the right direction. Thank you for the considerable work carried out by the International Panel on Climate Change.

Thank you to the Arctic Council for the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment and to Snowchange for their conference on Northern Indigenous and Local Community observations of Climate and Ecological Change. These provide critical insight and raise international awareness about the situation of the North.

However, we are concerned that the work being done is not enough.

We are concerned that science is not being met with awareness, and plans are not being met with action. More effort needs to be invested by individuals, communities, and governments, if the world is to reduce or reverse the impacts of climate change. We are concerned that the public at large is still unaware and uncertain of the threats of climate change. How can people be motivated to take positive action unless they understand the urgency of the situation?

The economy should no longer come before health and well being.

Full cost accounting, or more socially and ecologically based accounting mechanisms should be developed and integrated. Long-term vision needs to be incorporated into climate change response plans, recognizing that political and business timelines are too short.

We would like to help you move forward with a multi-generational, multi-disciplinary vision: working together, leaders and youth can redesign how society operates. Together we can lobby for holistic education and climate change curriculum so that today's youth are not only climate change literate, but are equipped with the tools to act.

The UN Decade of Education for Sustainability will end, but this task must not.

We would like you to encourage public awareness, youth involvement, and career development in the growth of closed loop industrial systems and Natural Capitalism models. Together, we can support growth in our communities by creating a diverse, no waste, solutions-based business framework that employs biomimicry.

We will learn to adapt to climate change in a way that considers the impacts of our solutions on the seven generations ahead of us. Our generations are linked, just as the Arctic is linked to the rest of the world. Choices made in the present will exponentially affect the future.

We are willing to make a difference and we challenge you to do the same.

We call on you to help us build the economic, political, and cultural infrastructure necessary for a sustainable future.

We offer you our vision of a strong North and a positive world.

If you protect the Arctic, you protect the world.


ExChanging Views

Was COP 11 worth it?

IAN CHURCH, SENIOR SCIENCE ADVISOR, YUKON GOVERNMENT

The ever-increasing rate at which we acquire new knowledge forces us to undergo an increasing number of shifts of worldview. This challenges our basic beliefs and forces us to change our behaviour.

Not until the shift in belief has occurred at the appropriate scale - be it at the individual, family, community, national or global scale - can we be willing to put in place the appropriate transformative action.

COP 11 truly was a milestone, but not because of any critical new discovery that was announced or specific resolution that was made. Instead it was a milestone because for the first time leaders from national governments, state and provincial governments, industry and business, cities and municipalities came together with youth, scientists, representatives from a broad coalition of non government organizations and aboriginal groups with a shared a common understanding of human forced climate change. We left with a belief that action would only be successful if taken collectively at a global scale.

This was unlike previous COPs where there were always a significant number of people who argued that action was not required or that human forced climate change was not real. Not so at COP 11. No longer were people debating whether climate change was real. No longer were people comforted in their thinking that climate change was an issue for those that unfortunately live in the wrong place. No longer were people thinking that somehow they were sheltered from its impacts and that they did not have to take any responsibility. No longer were people arguing that action was not needed.

Instead, at COP 11 we moved to the next step. We understood that the human forcing of climate change is a global phenomenon, though the effects vary dramatically across the face of the earth. We agreed that there is a need for action and that there are options that are both technically and fiscally feasible. We accepted that we are all on this earth together and everyone, including those in the Polar Regions, is both driving the changes and being affected by them.

COP 11 was worth it and all of us that experienced it should feel honoured to have participated.

 

JESSICA THIESSEN, COORDINATOR, ARCTIC YOUTH NETWORK

Sure, COP 11 was worth it. For those lucky enough to be in Montreal last November, the UNFCCC was like a big bear hug complete with a pat on the back and a "go get 'em tiger". For those interested in international politics, big environmental policies, or the blogging of activists and semi-activists, this event was a great big smash hit.

But what's actually come out of this? And what does this mean to those people who don't fully understand climate change or those who weren't in Montreal?

I am still hard pressed to find a Canadian who understands both the Kyoto Protocol and the implications of Canada holding the international chairmanship. We hosted the darn thing; you would think we would be energized by that fact.

However, there is more pride in how loud we can sing our National Anthem during the Stanley Cup playoffs than in how effectively and boldly we can lead the international community to take real steps toward addressing global climate change.

Most youth would say, "Heck ya, it was worth it - if we change the mind of one person then we made progress." Well that's great, but it will take more than just one person thinking about climate change only some of the time to deal with this issue.

Sure, we need to stay optimistic, but we also need to get our butts in gear. Living a lifestyle that contemplates conservation in EVERY decision is a big leap for a society that can have too much of anything whenever they want.

Even at the 11th Conference of the Parties, the Kyoto Protocol is still stumbling over its first steps. As a country privileged enough to think about the future, we have a responsibility to put progressive policies in place that will exemplify the kind of action that should be taken on an international scale. From building codes, support for bioregional policy, and tax incentives, to trade negotiation, corporate responsibility and consumer trends - we need to be leaders.

COP 11 was worth it. Unlike Canada, the International community is still trying.


Weathering Change is a quarterly newsletter published by the Northern Climate ExChange

© 2006 Northern Climate ExChange
Material may be used with appropriate attribution.


Northern Climate ExChange
Box 2799, 500 College Drive
Whitehorse, YT Y1A 5K8
(867) 668-8735

www.taiga.net/nce

To subscribe or unsubscribe to Weathering Change click here.