|
Northern Climate Change Schools Program
Background Information - Orientation to Sun Radiation from the Sun influences snow temperature that, in turn, plays a role in determining the strength of the snow. (Snow at the melting point is usually weaker than colder snow.) Sun exposed slopes tend to have higher temperatures than shaded slopes. In the northern hemisphere shady, cold slopes facing north and east tend to have weaker snow between December and March, because surface hoar and faceted grains (which often form weaker layers in the snowpack) are more likely to form and linger there than on sunny slopes. In the late winter and spring, however, sunny, south-facing slopes are more likely to contain weak snow due to strong warming. Orientation to Wind -- Loading & Lee Slopes The wind exposure of slopes is a primary factor in avalanche formation. Lee (downwind) slopes are more likely to produce avalanches than are other slopes with equal incline because they receive much greater accumulations of dense, slabby snow. Lee slopes are found behind high ridges, fall line ribs, rows of trees, hills, convex parts of slopes, and gully walls. Snow on slopes exposed to the wind (windward) is often shallow and/or irregular due to scouring, creating a potential weak snowpack. While local wind is significant, it is important to remember that ridge-top wind speed and direction may be quite different from winds experienced locally. Snow Profiles Snow Crystal Grain Form
When identifying snow crystal type (or grain form) such as when making observations in a snow profile or "snow pit" there is a standard graphical way of recording what you have observed. In Canada the "International Classification for Seasonal Snow on the Ground" (Colbeck, et al, 1990) is generally used to record the snow crystal type.
Chart from "Observation Guidelines and recording Standards for Weather, Snowpack and Avalanches"
Precipitation Particles
Precipitation Particles are any freshly fallen "new snow" type. This can include a wide variety of specific forms that are sub-classified here. The size of the individual grains can vary wildly. When the snow crystals have significant "rime" attached the small letter "r" is added behind the graphical symbol. When snow forms under varying conditions of temperature and humidity the actual crystal type can change during a storm. Different atmospheric conditions favour crystal growth in quite different ways.
Chart from "Observation Guidelines and recording Standards for Weather, Snowpack and Avalanches"
Surface Deposits and Crusts
Surface Deposits and Crusts is a category that includes sun crust, wind crust, rain crust, rime and other melt / freeze crusts.
Chart from "Observation Guidelines and recording Standards for Weather, Snowpack and Avalanches" Rime is the deposition of super-cooled water droplets on any object. It may build up into the wind on days when there is an "ice fog" of super cooled water droplets in the air. Firnspiegel is a thin, often highly reflective, type of sun crust formed by solar radiation on cold clear days. It acts like a "greenhouse" to enhance melting just below the surface. It may even appear to be suspended above the rest of the snow surface by a millimetre or more. Surface Hoar
Under certain conditions, a new snow crystal referred to as surface hoar forms directly on the surface. Surface hoar is created when air is cooled to below its dew point (dew point is the temperature at which air becomes completely saturated and must begin releasing water vapour) and deposits water vapour as ice onto a colder surface.
Diagram from "Avalanche Safety Course Overheads" For this to occur, the following conditions must be present:
Metamorphism of Snow Once new snow crystals are added to the snowpack they begin to metamorphose (change). From this point on, snow crystals are technically referred to as grains (although the word crystal is still used by many practitioners). Through metamorphism, the form and size of snow crystals and grains inside a snowpack change continuously, altering the strength characteristics of the snowpack. Metamorphism of snow in a seasonal snowpack is the result of sublimation and deposition. (Sublimation is the process of ice becoming vapour without going through a liquid state and vice versa.) During metamorphism in the snowpack, ice from grain surfaces changes into water vapour that is then deposited as ice at other grain surfaces as follows:
The Temperature Gradient The temperature gradient is the most important factor determining the type of metamorphism, the resulting grain form, and the rate of growth of the grains. Temperature Gradient is the difference in snow temperature across a given vertical distance in the snowpack. In practice it is expressed in degrees Celsius per 10 centimetres. As a general rule, a temperature gradient less than 1 degree / 10cm is considered weak. A strong temperature gradient is greater than 1degree / 10cm. Strong Temperature gradients promote greater vapour movement than weak gradients. The nature of the temperature gradient influences the type of metamorphic process that will be dominant in a given portion of the snowpack. The primary processes are faceting and rounding. (For a detailed explanation of faceting and rounding see the sections that follow below.) Faceting and rounding take place in the snowpack interchangeably. When the temperature gradient is strong and the snow density is low, the faceting process dominates. When the temperature gradient shits from strong to weak (usually the result of warming at the snow surface), faceted grains, depth hoar and surface hoar grains begin rounding. These large angular grains resist rounding much more than branched new snow crystals and may remain weak for long periods. Strong Temperature Gradient
The cross section of a snowpack at left shows a strong temperature gradient. The height of the snowpack is 100cm and the snow temperature near the top of the snowpack is -15 degrees C. This creates an "average" temperature gradient within this snowpack of 1.5 degrees / 10cm. The actual gradient in any particular layer varies and may be greater or less than this average, but it can be expected that in this sample snowpack the faceting process will be predominating. (This process has gone by other names including temperature gradient metamorphism, TG metamorphism, Constructive metamorphism, recrystallization and kinetic growth. The term faceting is preferred.) This example is fairly typical of a snowpack that you may find in early winter in many regions or in the Canadian Rockies even during mid-winter or later. If this temperature gradient does not change, the snowpack will continue to lose strength over time and a base of weak depth hoar will continue to develop. Faceted grains and depth hoar formed in this way will persist in the snowpack and can cause cycles of avalanche activity for the rest of the winter and even into the spring or, in some cases, summer.
Diagram from "Avalanche Safety Course Overheads" Weak Temperature Gradient
The cross section of a snowpack at left shows a weak temperature gradient. The height of the snowpack is 200cm and the snow temperature near the top of the snowpack is -15 degrees C. This creates an "average" temperature gradient within this snowpack of 0.75 degrees / 10cm. The actual gradient in any particular layer varies and may be greater or less than this average, but it can be expected that in this sample snowpack the rounding process will be predominating. (The rounding process has gone by other names including equi-temperature metamorphism, ET metamorphism, destructive metamorphism, and equilibrium growth. The term rounding is preferred.) In this sample snowpack, the temperature gradient is weaker near the base and stronger near the top. There is no place in this sample snowpack that the faceting process will be predominating.
Diagram from "Avalanche Safety Course Overheads" This example is fairly typical of a snowpack that you may find in early winter in a deep snowpack region with moderate climate (such as the Coast Ranges of British Columbia or the US). Similarly this type of snowpack may exist in the Columbia Mountains in the Interior of British Columbia in early winter during a heavy snowfall winter and certainly by mid winter in an average winter. The Canadian Rockies would typically only have this type of condition later in winter or spring or in a good snow year. If this temperature gradient does not change, the snowpack will continue to gain strength over time and any base of weaker facets as shown in this example will continue to strengthen. Even with a weak temperature gradient which promotes rounding and strengthening of the snowpack, hidden weak layers may exist. In this sample snowpack, a layer of surface hoar is buried just above 130cm. Buried surface hoar may persist in the snowpack and can cause cycles of avalanche activity for the next several weeks or more. The weak temperature gradient will eventually round out the surface hoar and promote bonding with the layers above and below but this gain in strength of this insidious layer can take a very long time in some cases. Rounding The rounding process builds rounded grains (rounds) which bond well to one another creating a snowpack (or layer) that is generally increasingly strong. In weak temperature gradients(<1 degree / 10cm) sublimation typically moves ice from convex surfaces (points) to concave surfaces (hollows) in 2 stages:
The following conditions promote rounding:
Faceting The faceting process builds angular grains (facets) which bond relatively poorly to one another and other grains creating a snowpack (or layer) that is generally increasingly weak. When the temperature gradient is strong (> 1 degree / 10cm) water vapour moves rapidly from warm grain surfaces to colder surfaces. Because the snowpack usually is warm (at or near 0 degrees C) at the ground and colder at the surface, ice sublimates from lower, warmer grains and is deposited onto colder grains higher up in the snowpack. These colder grains first develop sharp corners, then stepped facets.
If the faceting process continues, large, six -- sided hollow or filled cup shaped grains called depth hoar are formed. Depth Hoar is common in Rocky Mountain climates, around large rocks and high shrubs, and where the snowpack is thin. The following conditions promote faceting:
Text and diagram from "Advanced Avalanche Safety Course Manual" Sintering Sintering is usually associated with the rounding process. Water Vapour is deposited at the contact points between snow grains forming necks. These necks create strong bonds between grains, increasing snow strength.
Mechanical Hardening Compaction from any mechanical disturbance such as boots, skis, snowmobiles, groomers, wind and avalanches breaks up large grains and brings grains into close contact, producing rapid sintering. Melt-Freeze Metamorphism The change in snow grains as the snowpack becomes wet (snow temperature reaches 0 degrees C) and subsequently refreezes is known as melt-freeze metamorphism. This process usually occurs during late winter and spring when air temperatures are high, solar radiation is high, and cycles of melting and refreezing are common. Melt-freeze crust layers that exist in the freeze part of the cycle can be very strong. Avalanche Risk Assessment Slope Incline and Avalanche Frequency A primary requirement for avalanche formation is a slope incline that is steep enough for avalanches to initiate and then accelerate. The following guidelines for using slope incline to predict avalanche size and frequency have been developed from experience.
Avalanches are rare on slopes with an incline greater than 55 degrees because the snow sluffs off frequently in small amounts.
Diagram from "Avalanche Safety Course Overheads" A minimum slope angle is required to initiate a slab failure, however, a fracture may propagate to an area with less incline after initial failure on a steeper slope has occurred. In "Avalanche Accidents in Canada -- Volume 4" by Geldsetzer and Jamieson it was reported that in a sample of 184 recreational avalanche accidents, 83% of them occurred on slopes between 25 and 40 degrees and half of these fell in the range from 31 to 35 degrees. (From talk given by T. Geldsetzer, Edmonton, AB, November, 1997)
Text from "Advanced Avalanche Safety Course Manual" Avalanche Types Loose Snow Avalanches Loose avalanches are usually confined to surface layers, and therefore are often small. Loose snow avalanches:
Small loose snow avalanches (size 1) are often referred to as "sluffs". Since loose snow avalanches start from a point and fan out, they are also called "point releases". Slab Avalanches Large Hazardous avalanches are usually slab avalanches. Slab Avalanches:
Failure of a Snow Slab For a slab avalanche to start, there must be:
The most important characteristic of the snowpack with respect to formation of slab avalanches is the existence of a weak layer underlying a stronger layer or layers and / or a weak boundary between layers. Slab avalanches start when the weight of snow layers and a trigger combine to create forces which exceed the strength of the snow. Slab avalanches are thought to occur as follows:
Tests for Slope Stability Compression Test The test as described here was developed by Parks Canada Wardens working in the Canadian Rockies in the 1970s. Similar tests were developed elsewhere. The test identifies weak layers and is most effective at finding weak layers near the snow surface. Manual taps applied to a shovel blade placed on top of a snow column cause weak layers within the column to fail. These failures can be seen on the smooth walls of the column. The test can be performed on level or sloping terrain. A pit is dug in undisturbed snow to expose a smooth snow wall on a safe slope representative of the slopes of interest. The pit is dug to ground or until well below any possible significant weak layers (often as much as 2 metres deep). The column is not dug down to very weak layers of facets or depth hoar if these layers are likely to fail before upper weak layers of interest. A column of snow 30cm wide (across the slope) and 30 cm upslope is created as in the diagram at left. A snow saw can assist in creating the column and making the subsequent backcut that is required. Be sure the visible walls of the column are smooth so that subtle failures can be easily seen. A shovel is placed squarely on the surface of the column and progressively harder taps are applied to the shovel blade. Any failures are recorded. Collapse of very thin layers may be subtle and hard to detect. In most cases it is good to have a second person observe for these failures while the first person applies the taps. The size and type of crystals at the failure plane (often from the underside of the block) are also recorded. Another backcut is now made an additional 70cm below the first and the process is repeated to the bottom of the pit. The test may be repeated to verify the results or a Shovel Shear Test may be done alongside the first test location. The amount of effort required to cause the failure is recorded as follows:
The primary objective of the compression test is the identification of weak layers. Deeper layers are generally less sensitive to taps on the shovel resulting in higher ratings. Similarly, deeper layers are less sensitive to human triggering. Experience in the Canadian Rockies suggests that layers with "very easy" or "easy" failures are more often associated with human or explosive triggering than are "moderate" or "hard" failures. Sudden failures that show up on the column wall as distinct lines seem more likely to indicate potential failure planes than rough or indistinct failures. Caution: While the rating of effort needed to have the snow fail in compression may assist with a decision concerning snow failure, it is an inaccurate measurement of slope stability. The ratings of effort are subjective and depend on the strength and stiffness of the slab, on the size and shape of the shovel, the experience of the tester and on whether or not the test site is truly representative of the slope of interest for which the test is being applied. NOTE: If the top surface slopes, test the near surface layers then remove a wedge of snow to level the top of the column. Once level. place the shovel blade squarely on top of the column and continue testing. Tapping forces are not transmitted efficiently down through the column, particularly through soft layers within the column. Harder taps are generally required to cause failure in deep layers, particularly if the layers between the shovel and the weak layers contain soft snow. Snow below the shovel that crushes and fails to support the shovel squarely should be removed. The tends to reduce the force required to cause failures in the remaining column. Text modified after "Advanced Avalanche Safety Course Manual" Rutschblock Test The "rutschblock" (or glide-block) test is a slope test that was developed in Switzerland in the 1960s. This section is based on a recent Swiss analysis of rutschblock tests (Fohn, 1987) and on Canadian Research experience (Jamieson and Johnston, 1993). Test sites should be safe, representative of the avalanche terrain under consideration and undisturbed. For example, to gain information about a wind blown slope, find a safe part of a similarly loaded slope for a test. The site should not contain buried ski or snowmobile tracks, avalanche deposits, etc. or be within about 5 m or trees where the buried layers might be disturbed by wind action or by clumps of snow which have fallen from nearby trees. Although Dr. P. Fohn (1987) recommends slope angles of at least 30 degrees, rutschblocks of 25 -- 30 degrees may also give useful information (discussed below). Be aware that near the top of a slope, snowpack layering and hence rutschblock scores may differ from the slope below. After identifying weak layers (and potential slabs) in a snow profile, extend the pit wall until its width is larger than the observers skis or snowboard (2 metres minimum) across the slope. (Do not omit the profile unless the layering is already known.) Mark the width of the block and the length of the side cuts ( 1.5 m) on the surface of the snow with a ski, ruler, etc. The block should be 2m wide throughout if the block is to be dug with a shovel. However, if the side walls are to be cur with a ski, pole, cord or saw, the lower wall should be about 2.1 m across and the top of the side cuts should be about 1.9m apart. This flaring of the block ensures it is free to slide without binding at the sides. The lower wall should be a smooth surface cut with a shovel. Dig or cut the side walls and the upper wall deeper than any weak layers that may be active. If the side walls are exposed by shoveling, then one rutschblock test may require 20 or more minutes for two people. If the weak layers of interest are within 60cm of the surface, time can be saved by cutting both the sides and the upper wall of the block with a ski pole (basket removed) or with the tail of a ski. If the weak layers are deeper than 60cm and the overlying snow does not contain any knife-hard crusts, both the sides and the upper wall of the block can be sawed with cord which travels up one side, around ski poles or probes placed at both upper corners of the block and down the other side. The rutschblock is loaded, and failure recorded, in the following sequence:
We should be very careful with interpreting slope tests since they overestimate the slope stability at least 10% of the time. (Jamieson, 2000) The rutschblock is a good slope test but it is not a one stop stability evaluation. The test does not eliminate the need for snow profiles or careful field observations nor does it, in general, replace other slope tests such as ski cutting and explosive tests. The rutschblock only tests those layers deeper than ski or snowboard penetration. For example, a weak layer 20 cm below the surface is not tested by skis which penetrate 20cm or more. Higher and more variable rutschblock scores are sometimes observed near the top of a slope where layering may differ from the middle and lower part of the slope (Jamieson and Johnston, 1993). Higher scores may contribute to an incorrect decision. Rutschblock results are easiest to interpret if the tests are done in avalanche starting zones. However, since there is a general tendency for rutschblock scores to increase by 1 for each 10 degree decrease in slope angle (Jamieson and Johnston, 1993), scores for avalanche slopes can be estimated from safer, less steep slopes (as shallow as 25 degrees). Note that rutschblocks done on slopes of less than 30 degrees require a smooth lower wall and a second person standing in or near the pit to observe the small displacements (often less than 1 cm) that indicate a shear failure.
|